The Federal Government on Monday reported that it had marked a Memorandum of Understanding with Mota-Engil Group for the development of the $1.959bn Kano-Maradi standard check rail project.
Priest of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, endorsed for the benefit of the Federal Government, while the Managing Director, Mota-Engil, Antonio Gvoea, endorsed in the interest of the contracting firm.
In any case, container Yoruba sociocultural gathering, Afenifere, kicked against the move, saying that with such a lot of shortfall in the nation's vehicle framework, the public authority was going a misguided course with the rail project.
The $1.96bn Kano-Maradi rail line associates Nigeria and Niger Republic.
The Director, Press and Public Relations, Federal Ministry of Transportation, Eric Ojiekwe, said in an assertion gave in Abuja that the new railroad hall, situated in Northern Nigeria and Maradi in Niger Republic would go through three states.
He delineated the states as incorporate Kano, Jigawa and Katsina, adding that it would experience the region Niger Republic to the extent Maradi.
"Different urban communities that will be influenced by the rail line in Nigeria are Danbatta, Kazaure, Daura, Mashi, Katsina and Jibiya," the FMT said.
It added, "The 283.75km rail line, other than creating cargo and traveler transport as it will be coordinated with street transport, will make extraordinary commitment to the nearby economy."
The service said the venture would likewise contribute in building up the social area.
It said the venture span was for three years and the agreement type was designing, acquirement and development.
The marking function was likewise seen by the service's Permanent Secretary, Magdalene Ajani; Director, Legal Services, Pius Oteh; Head of Legal, Mota-Engil Group, Cameron Beverley; and Magajin Garin Kano, Muhammad Wada; among others.
The Publicity Secretary of, Afenifere, Yinka Odumakin, told our reporter that numerous Nigerians were against the move by government to build the rail line.
He said tragically the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), was more keen on building a venture outside Nigeria than in creating streets inside Nigeria.
Odumakin stated, "It is an appalling turn of events. We know the province of Nigerian streets. We realize that our streets are in a terrible shape, for example, take a gander at the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, the ways toward the East, to Port Harcourt and most of them.
"They are not Buhari's need; rather his need presently is the line to Maradi in Niger Republic. They are more inspired by their friends and relatives who are Fulanis outside Nigeria than in Nigeria itself."
He added, "It is appalling. So the Afenifere and numerous different Nigerians out there are not on the side of this activity. Indeed, how might we uphold it?"
A Public Affairs expert, Bala Zakka, contended that it was more conservative to decongest Apapa ports than to build a rail line to its Niger partner.
He stated, "It would bode well on the off chance that you develop a rail line out of Apapa to the hinterland so that trucks can be cleared from Apapa. It is better you take cargoes to Edo State or Osun State than everyone comes into Apapa.
"What might be helpful to me as a Nigerian is to decongest Apapa through rail than going to Maradi. It is multiple times prudent for you have railroad out of Apapa to places out of Lagos. This will prompt improvement in different states."
The investigator said that the public authority has kept on overlooking the exhortation of technocrats, and the best an ideal opportunity to have managed this issue was the point at which it was as yet separated for thought. Zakka said what was left was to sit back and watch the impacts of the approach.
Also, an educator of financial aspects at the Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Prof. Sheriffdeen Tella, encouraged the public authority to zero in on payload since the arrangement had been agreed upon.
He stated, "Rail project is significant as a feature of the vehicle framework. My solitary concern is that the public authority is more worried about travelers than merchandise. Though it is smarter to have the rail developed so it can move products on the grounds that moving merchandise by means of rail is significant.
"It is more critical to consider trains that will move load which will decongest our streets.
"What the public authority has been doing has been light rail. Light rail can't convey load and the public authority is doing light rail. The public authority should likewise ensure that whatever is spent on the venture is recuperated."
The college wear said the most ideal way it very well may be recuperated was through load tasks. He asked that the public authority ought to do a rail for payload which can be used for individuals and products.